.svg)
Introduction
Marketing SaaS platforms are built to move fast. AI, automation, and self-serve features promise speed and scale, but when we acted like real customers, we found something different.
Speed stopped at the software. CX didn’t keep up.
This mystery shop didn’t evaluate product features or technical capabilities. We tested the human side of SaaS: how these platforms respond when something goes wrong — like when a user needs fast help with an account change, a billing question, or a quick cancellation.
We tracked every interaction across bot and live chat, email, and in-app flows. Some brands delivered clean handoffs and clear escalation paths. Others left us stranded, confused, or completely ignored.
Here’s what we found, and what it means for scaling CX in a high-stakes category.
The Brands We Shopped
We tested real support issues across four B2B Marketing SaaS companies:
The All-in-One GEO Challenger
Broad, feature-rich platform positioning itself against established SEO tools with an integrated AI optimization approach.
The AI Search Pioneer
Early category builder, focused on AI search visibility and brand presence monitoring inside generative engines.
The Lightweight AEO Platform
Simplified, lower-overhead entry point into answer engine optimization with limited breadth compared to full GEO suites.
The AI Visibility Contender
Credible AI monitoring provider competing in the GEO space with narrower feature depth and growing recognition.
What We Tested
We signed up for four AI-powered marketing platforms that deliver AI search visibility (also referred to as Answer Engine Optimization [AEO] or Generative Engine Optimization [GEO]).
We designed three common real-world scenarios that put CX to the test in pivotal journey moments where the brands either showed up or fell short.
Test Type
What We Did
What We Measured
Pre-Purchase Question
Asked real buying questions about AI functionality and pricing clarity via Instagram and LinkedIn
- Response Speed
- Clarity
- Bot vs. Human
- Follow-Through
- Friction
- Whether the Issue was Fully Resolved
Account Management Scenario
Asked how to transfer account ownership from personal email to company email via contact form
Urgent Cancellation Request
Submitted immediate cancellation request via website chat
We examined both bot and human interactions, evaluating accuracy, speed, completeness, and tone.
Did we walk away feeling that our issue was satisfactorily resolved, and how difficult was it to get that resolution?
Who This Report Is For
You’re a CX, RevOps, or Support leader at a SaaS company who wants to scale efficiently without sacrificing quality.
You know automation, bots, and AI can help. But you may also be asking:
- What’s the right role for human agents in an AI-led experience?
- When should automation take over, and when should it back off?
- How do you ensure every customer journey ends with trust, not frustration?
This mystery shop surfaces what your customers notice first — friction, confusion, and broken promises — and what those moments reveal about your underlying CX strategy.
And it will help you spot the early signs of a misaligned CX strategy before your customers do.
What We Found
We experienced friction in every experiment.
When we asked for help canceling immediately, only one platform delivered — resolving our issue instantly with automation and no need for human escalation.
Two others replied, but neither delivered a clean or complete resolution.
One didn’t respond at all.
In the account-ownership test, only two platforms gave clear, actionable guidance. One offered partial clarity, and one provided no path at all to submit the request.
And before purchase? Every vendor ghosted us on at least one channel.
All four contenders sell automation. Only one used it to provide a seamless customer experience.
And those who promised access to a human all failed to deliver.
What We Learned
These platforms compete in overlapping markets, sell similar products, and target the same buyer personas. But their customer experience delivery couldn’t have been more different.
Vendor
What Worked
What Didn’t
Key Takeaway
The All-in-One GEO Challenger
Nothing in this experience reflected a successful or customer-centric interaction.
Pre-purchase questions went unanswered, the account-ownership scenario couldn’t even be submitted, and the cancellation workflow introduced friction without resolution.
Friction appeared immediately. Pre-purchase questions submitted through social channels received no response, leaving early buying signals entirely unaddressed.
In the account-ownership test, this was the only platform without a path to email support.
The cancellation request echoed the same pattern. The chat widget showed an initial automated acknowledgment, but the eventual human response focused on retention without answering our question. At no point was a clear, customer-focused cancellation path offered.
Across all tests, the company consistently acknowledged intent to help without delivering actionable resolutions, accessible support paths, or reliable follow-through.
When customers can’t get an answer from support, can’t find a contact form to submit questions, and can’t resolve simple account tasks, trust quickly disappears.
Operational gaps like these weaken the entire customer relationship long before renewal conversations ever happen.
The AI Search Pioneer
AI-led support handled a high-stakes cancellation request instantly, with clear, step-by-step instructions and no need for human escalation.
Email support for changing account ownership was timely and helpful, offering a workable, cost-free path to transfer control.
Like the other vendors, the platform never replied to our pre-purchase Instagram question, exposing a gap between in-product responsiveness and social channel coverage.
And while the email guidance on account ownership worked, it left a few details unspoken, creating small pockets of uncertainty around long-term account control.
The Lightweight AEO Platform
Email support for the account-ownership change was fast, clear, and resolved with an in-product, native workflow — no workaround needed.
The cancellation answer (once surfaced) provided the correct link and clear guidance.
The cancellation experience broke down at the delivery layer: the bot promised a human in “a few minutes,” but no reply arrived while we stayed online — and no email or notification ever followed.
The human response did come, but only inside the app (which we found days later) making the help effectively invisible.
Lightweight doesn’t have to mean limited — but communication gaps can make it feel that way. Even when support teams say the right thing, delivery failures (no alerts, delayed visibility, incomplete escalation) quietly erode trust and make otherwise solid guidance easy to miss.
The AI Visibility Contender
Fast, clear pre-sale responsiveness on LinkedIn created early momentum, offering direct pricing confirmation and actionable next steps.
The support tone was professional and the speed engagement made the platform initially feel accessible and attentive.
Every subsequent support moment broke that early promise.
The account-change question surfaced confusing support pathways, a form with no submission confirmation, and an email reply that said the change was “definitely possible” but offered no instructions or clarity.
The cancellation request performed worse: the bot said “We’ll email you back,” but no follow-up ever arrived.
Key issues went unresolved, and promised follow-through never materialized.
Even a strong brand voice and product clarity can’t make up for operational breakdowns. Visibility doesn’t matter if customers are left hanging.
Where CX Quietly Breaks: The Moments That Erode Trust
When Doubt Creeps In
First-time SaaS customers have high expectations of the product and the experience. They want clarity, responsiveness, and clear paths to resolution. But across the platforms we tested, that initial confidence began to slip well before we ever attempted to cancel.
Experiment 1: Pre-Purchase Questions
- Social inquiries on Instagram went unanswered
- LinkedIn replies were inconsistent or delayed
Experiment 2: Account-Management Support (Change Ownership)
- A form submitted with no confirmation
- A reply that appeared in-platform days later with no notification
- A simple ownership-change workflow that became harder than necessary
Experiment 3: Immediate Cancellation Requests
- Bots that promised follow-up but never delivered
- Human replies that focused on retention instead of resolution
- One vendor who never replied at all
Each moment chipped away at trust. And together, they planted seeds of doubt long before we churned.
When It’s Hard to Get Answers
Some of the most telling moments came when we asked for help.
In theory, AI-powered SaaS platforms should make it easy to get answers. But across our mystery shop, customer support was often a black box:
- Social inquiries and live chats went unacknowledged
- Email replies focused on retention instead of resolution
- And most telling: brands who simply never replied
When a user is new to your platform and something goes wrong, that first interaction sets the tone. Failure to resolve is a major trust breaker, and too many brands in this mystery shop dropped the ball.
Tracking Trust Across the SaaS Customer Journey
Every DM, chatbot reply, help-center form, and in-app interaction shapes how reliable a software feels long before renewal ever comes into view.
Across our three experiments (pre-purchase questions, account management, and urgent cancellation) we saw how differently each vendor handled the points where customers feel most vulnerable. These are the moments where CX strategy becomes visible.
Some vendors clarified, guided, and resolved. Others hesitated, redirected, or vanished entirely.
Taken together, these interactions reveal the difference between a platform that earns trust and one that undermines it.
Response Speed
Clarity
Bot + Human Orchestration
Follow-Through
Friction
Issue Fully Resolved
The All-in-One GEO Challenger
The AI Search Pioneer
The Lightweight AEO Platform
The AI Visibility Contender
Key:
Major trust-breaker
Minor friction
Smooth experience
Why This Matters:
Routine moments — early product questions, basic account changes, urgent cancellations — should be effortless across the customer journey. When simple requests require workarounds, channels become dead-ends, or follow-through falls through, customers notice.
Stress-Tested: What Happens When SaaS CX Meets Real Customer Problems
During our cancellation experiment, only one vendor (AI Search Pioneer) performed well across speed, clarity, and follow-through. Most struggled, and the gaps compounded under pressure.
Support Element
Best-in-Class
Missed Opportunity
Resolution
The AI Search Pioneer
- The bot clearly explained how to cancel and linked directly to the portal
- This was the ONLY vendor to resolve our issue fully and in a timely manner
The AI Visibility Contender
- Bot said “We’ll email you back,” but no email ever arrived
- No follow-up, no resolution
The Lightweight AEO Platform
- Bot promised a handoff to a human; we waited 10 minutes and no human came
- Days later we logged into the dashboard and found a short response, buried in the in-app chat with no email notification (meaning the customer didn’t know they’d been helped)
Speed to First Response
The AI Search Pioneer
- Instant bot response resolved the issue with no escalation needed
The All-in-One GEO Challenger
- Instant auto-response said “we got your message,”
- But the human reply came hours later, and didn't resolve the issue
Ease of Account Management
The AI Search Pioneer
- Provided a direct, easy-to-navigate cancellation path with no friction
The Lightweight AEO Platform
- Resolution came late, with no alert, and only after we re-logged into the product and reopened the chat manually.
Clarity of Instructions
The AI Search Pioneer
- Bot laid out cancellation steps clearly, requiring no clarification or escalation
The All-in-One GEO Challenger
- The human agent ignored our clear cancellation request and instead pushed retention offers
- Even the retention options provided were vague, and steps to move forward were unclear
Notification + Follow-Up
The AI Search Pioneer
- Issue addressed clearly in real-time with no lingering questions or need for follow-up
The Lightweight AEO Platform
- Chat response arrived late (after we’d abandoned) with no email or alert
- We had no idea we’d received a reply
Why This Matters:
Immediate cancellations expose how well your automation, handoff logic, and internal processes actually work when the stakes are high. These moments reveal whether your CX strategy can handle real customer pressure.
The Hidden Cost of Letting Friction Linger
None of these issues were technically “broken.” Pages loaded. Emails sent. Bots responded. But friction points, compounded over time, created major cracks in the customer experience.
Want to know where your CX is quietly losing conversions?
We’ll help you see it through your customer’s eyes — and build a full-lifecycle CX journey that keeps them moving forward.